Trump: If the US were Nigeria
Azuka Onwuka
The same key factor that made Barack 
Obama president of the United States of America in 2008 was what made 
Donald Trump win the US presidential election last week.
It was the same factor that made a 
relatively unknown Bill Clinton, who was the governor of the state of 
Arkansas, to beat a sitting president in the person of George H. W. Bush
 in 1992, even after the victory Bush won against Saddam Hussein in 
Operation Desert Storm the previous year.
That factor is the supremacy of the 
American voting public on the issue of who should lead them, no matter 
what the powerful interest groups and individuals want. Nobody chooses 
for the Americans who is best for them. Nobody thinks he knows what will
 be better for the Americans more than they do. The Americans do that 
themselves. And nobody sits down somewhere to change the figures or use 
the security agencies to harass and intimidate opponents.
And after four years, the people can 
decide to kick out the same person they elected four years before. The 
incumbent president cannot manipulate the system or intimidate his 
opponents with arrests and threats. He cannot even use the money of the 
nation for his campaign or accept donations from state governors. In 
short, the power of incumbency confers no advantage on him. He will have
 to sell his candidacy to the electorate like any other candidate. If 
the electorate prefer him, he will win, but if not, he joins the list of
 former presidents. If he has completed his two terms, he cannot choose 
who succeeds him. It is that simple.
In 2007 when George W. Bush’s tenure was
 drawing to a close, it was taken for granted that the Democratic Party 
would win the 2008 election, because of the bad image Bush had given to 
the US with his invasion of Iraq in search of chemical weapons that did 
not exit. Hillary Clinton was seen as the most popular Democrat that 
would get the party’s ticket, win the presidential election and become 
the first female president of the USA, a feat India had achieved in 1966
 with Mrs Indira Gandhi and Pakistan achieved in 1988 with Mrs Benazir 
Bhutto, both as prime ministers.
People had begun to ask what Hillary 
Clinton’s husband, Bill, who had been a president, would be called: 
First Gentleman, First Dude, etc. Then a senator, who had only spent two
 years at the Senate, happened on the scene with oratorical skills and 
“Yes, We Can” message.  Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and other Democratic 
aspirants sneered at his ambition and called him inexperienced. His 
being Black with an Arabic first name (easily linked with Islam) did not
 help matters. Other better-known Blacks who had contested in the past 
did not even win the party’s ticket. But Barack Obama eventually won the
 ticket of the Democrats to the consternation of many.
Yet, some people believed that it was 
not possible for a non-White to rule America. I remember that while 
discussing the American election in 2008 with some Nigerians who claimed
 to know how the American system worked, they told me that the American 
powerbrokers and the CIA would find a way of ensuring that Obama did not
 win the election. When Obama eventually won, I told myself: “Surely, 
these guys know how the American system works!”
Trump’s emergence similarly looked like a
 joke. I thought he was a complete outsider who just wanted to register 
his presence in the minds of the American voters. I had liked his 
bravado in business. But I was shocked at his words during the 
campaigns. Ironically, the more he spewed out his words, the more states
 he won in the Republican Party primaries in spite of the high calibre 
of contestants among the Republicans. Eventually, he won the Republican 
ticket. I began to ask: “What if Trump wins?” The response I got from 
many Nigerians was: “It is not possible. American powerbrokers would not
 allow such an erratic, foul-mouthed man to smell the presidency.”
I saw the way even his top party 
members, institutions sympathetic to the Republican Party, and former 
American presidents all came out to criticise him and withdraw their 
support for him. All kinds of allegations of things he said or did in 
the past were unearthed. Still his popularity did not wane. Even our own
 Nobel laureate, Prof Wole Soyinka, said he would shred his American 
Green Card in protest if Trump won the election. And last week Trump won
 the election.
 Trump’s victory re-enforced the 
supremacy of the American electorate. Truly, in the US, power belongs to
 the people. If Trump had contested in Nigeria, some powerful interest 
groups would have done everything to stop him. Even if he won the 
election, they could have doctored the result to get him out.
 That is why if Obama had been a 
Nigerian, his oratory would have taken him no way near the presidency. 
He would not win the presidential ticket of any of the top two political
 parties. He would have been warned to avoid excessive ambition and be 
grateful for his seat at the Senate and “wait” for his time. If he was 
lucky, he would be made the running mate of a former general or Senate 
President or governor. That is why no young leader would emerge from 
“nowhere” in Nigeria and become the President.
  But the irony is that even though the 
US believes it knows what is good for itself, it does not believe that 
some other countries know what is good for them. The action of the US 
over the electoral victories of Hamas in Palestine and the Muslim 
Brotherhood in Egypt was hypocritical and arrogant. It is the same 
arrogance that made countries like the United Kingdom and France go 
round colonising other countries on the pretext that they wanted to 
bring civilisation to barbaric people.
The US supports repressive and despotic 
regimes in many countries as long as the leader is its ally. 
Self-interest is good for countries but it becomes irritating when it is
 brazen. If the US feels threatened by any choice made by the 
Palestinian or Egyptian electorate because of the safety of Israel, it 
should fortify itself and Israel and respond robustly to any aggression 
against the latter. I believe in the right of Israel to exist 
undisturbed but other countries must also be allowed to choose who they 
want. If their elected leadership attacks Israel, both countries should 
teach them a lesson they will never forget in a hurry.
 Americans have elected their next 
leader. Those who are demonstrating against that choice are exercising 
their right but they are also working against that same right: the 
freedom of the people to choose whom they want as their leader. If the 
election was rigged, their demonstration would have had a basis. But 
telling the electorate that they do not have a right to choose is 
dictatorial and anti-democratic.
The beauty of American democracy is that
 unlike Nigeria’s where the president controls the security agencies, 
electoral agency, and many other state agencies, and can use them to 
their advantage and to oppress the opponents, the American president 
cannot do that. Therefore, an American president can easily be voted 
out. So, the demonstrators have an opportunity to vote out Trump in 2020
 if they find his term below expectations.
The only good the demonstrations may 
serve is to remind Trump that while in office, any action he takes will 
either boost or dash his 2020 electoral chances.
Every nation which practises democracy 
should make up its mind if it wants democracy, which empowers the people
 to decide who should lead them, or something else dressed up as 
democracy.
—Twitter @BrandAzuka
Comments
Post a Comment