Trump: If the US were Nigeria
US President-elect Donald Trump flanked by members of his family
/ AFP PHOTO / Timothy A. CLARY
Azuka Onwuka
The same key factor that made Barack
Obama president of the United States of America in 2008 was what made
Donald Trump win the US presidential election last week.
It was the same factor that made a
relatively unknown Bill Clinton, who was the governor of the state of
Arkansas, to beat a sitting president in the person of George H. W. Bush
in 1992, even after the victory Bush won against Saddam Hussein in
Operation Desert Storm the previous year.
That factor is the supremacy of the
American voting public on the issue of who should lead them, no matter
what the powerful interest groups and individuals want. Nobody chooses
for the Americans who is best for them. Nobody thinks he knows what will
be better for the Americans more than they do. The Americans do that
themselves. And nobody sits down somewhere to change the figures or use
the security agencies to harass and intimidate opponents.
And after four years, the people can
decide to kick out the same person they elected four years before. The
incumbent president cannot manipulate the system or intimidate his
opponents with arrests and threats. He cannot even use the money of the
nation for his campaign or accept donations from state governors. In
short, the power of incumbency confers no advantage on him. He will have
to sell his candidacy to the electorate like any other candidate. If
the electorate prefer him, he will win, but if not, he joins the list of
former presidents. If he has completed his two terms, he cannot choose
who succeeds him. It is that simple.
In 2007 when George W. Bush’s tenure was
drawing to a close, it was taken for granted that the Democratic Party
would win the 2008 election, because of the bad image Bush had given to
the US with his invasion of Iraq in search of chemical weapons that did
not exit. Hillary Clinton was seen as the most popular Democrat that
would get the party’s ticket, win the presidential election and become
the first female president of the USA, a feat India had achieved in 1966
with Mrs Indira Gandhi and Pakistan achieved in 1988 with Mrs Benazir
Bhutto, both as prime ministers.
People had begun to ask what Hillary
Clinton’s husband, Bill, who had been a president, would be called:
First Gentleman, First Dude, etc. Then a senator, who had only spent two
years at the Senate, happened on the scene with oratorical skills and
“Yes, We Can” message. Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and other Democratic
aspirants sneered at his ambition and called him inexperienced. His
being Black with an Arabic first name (easily linked with Islam) did not
help matters. Other better-known Blacks who had contested in the past
did not even win the party’s ticket. But Barack Obama eventually won the
ticket of the Democrats to the consternation of many.
Yet, some people believed that it was
not possible for a non-White to rule America. I remember that while
discussing the American election in 2008 with some Nigerians who claimed
to know how the American system worked, they told me that the American
powerbrokers and the CIA would find a way of ensuring that Obama did not
win the election. When Obama eventually won, I told myself: “Surely,
these guys know how the American system works!”
Trump’s emergence similarly looked like a
joke. I thought he was a complete outsider who just wanted to register
his presence in the minds of the American voters. I had liked his
bravado in business. But I was shocked at his words during the
campaigns. Ironically, the more he spewed out his words, the more states
he won in the Republican Party primaries in spite of the high calibre
of contestants among the Republicans. Eventually, he won the Republican
ticket. I began to ask: “What if Trump wins?” The response I got from
many Nigerians was: “It is not possible. American powerbrokers would not
allow such an erratic, foul-mouthed man to smell the presidency.”
I saw the way even his top party
members, institutions sympathetic to the Republican Party, and former
American presidents all came out to criticise him and withdraw their
support for him. All kinds of allegations of things he said or did in
the past were unearthed. Still his popularity did not wane. Even our own
Nobel laureate, Prof Wole Soyinka, said he would shred his American
Green Card in protest if Trump won the election. And last week Trump won
the election.
Trump’s victory re-enforced the
supremacy of the American electorate. Truly, in the US, power belongs to
the people. If Trump had contested in Nigeria, some powerful interest
groups would have done everything to stop him. Even if he won the
election, they could have doctored the result to get him out.
That is why if Obama had been a
Nigerian, his oratory would have taken him no way near the presidency.
He would not win the presidential ticket of any of the top two political
parties. He would have been warned to avoid excessive ambition and be
grateful for his seat at the Senate and “wait” for his time. If he was
lucky, he would be made the running mate of a former general or Senate
President or governor. That is why no young leader would emerge from
“nowhere” in Nigeria and become the President.
But the irony is that even though the
US believes it knows what is good for itself, it does not believe that
some other countries know what is good for them. The action of the US
over the electoral victories of Hamas in Palestine and the Muslim
Brotherhood in Egypt was hypocritical and arrogant. It is the same
arrogance that made countries like the United Kingdom and France go
round colonising other countries on the pretext that they wanted to
bring civilisation to barbaric people.
The US supports repressive and despotic
regimes in many countries as long as the leader is its ally.
Self-interest is good for countries but it becomes irritating when it is
brazen. If the US feels threatened by any choice made by the
Palestinian or Egyptian electorate because of the safety of Israel, it
should fortify itself and Israel and respond robustly to any aggression
against the latter. I believe in the right of Israel to exist
undisturbed but other countries must also be allowed to choose who they
want. If their elected leadership attacks Israel, both countries should
teach them a lesson they will never forget in a hurry.
Americans have elected their next
leader. Those who are demonstrating against that choice are exercising
their right but they are also working against that same right: the
freedom of the people to choose whom they want as their leader. If the
election was rigged, their demonstration would have had a basis. But
telling the electorate that they do not have a right to choose is
dictatorial and anti-democratic.
The beauty of American democracy is that
unlike Nigeria’s where the president controls the security agencies,
electoral agency, and many other state agencies, and can use them to
their advantage and to oppress the opponents, the American president
cannot do that. Therefore, an American president can easily be voted
out. So, the demonstrators have an opportunity to vote out Trump in 2020
if they find his term below expectations.
The only good the demonstrations may
serve is to remind Trump that while in office, any action he takes will
either boost or dash his 2020 electoral chances.
Every nation which practises democracy
should make up its mind if it wants democracy, which empowers the people
to decide who should lead them, or something else dressed up as
democracy.
—Twitter @BrandAzuka
Comments
Post a Comment